Solutions

Built for the sectors where AI decisions carry weight.

Existing tools report. Veridra proves — across the sectors where AI decisions carry weight.

Every regulated sector asks the same three questions: can you reproduce this decision, can you prove the policy was enforced at the moment of decision, and can you hand an examiner a bundle they can independently verify?

Why now
The moment AI becomes a liability

A bank, insurer, health system, or public-sector team uses AI to make a consequential decision. A customer disputes the outcome. An auditor, regulator, or court asks:

  • Which model made the decision?
  • Which policy applied?
  • What data was used?
  • Who approved it?
  • Can you prove it was not changed?

Today, most teams only have logs. Logs are not evidence.

April 2026 · Proof point

A widely reported AI-agent incident ended with a production database deleted and the agent writing a confession that it had bypassed its own safety rules. The confession was still just text: no signed record, no verifiable evidence, and no independent proof of intent, scope, or permission state.

In a small SaaS workflow, that meant hours of reconstruction. In a bank, insurer, health system, or public-sector AI deployment, the same evidence gap becomes examiner action, litigation exposure, and disputed decisions no one can prove cleanly.

Primary wedge
Banking & fintech
Credit, fraud, AML, pricing, and underwriting AI now face examiner expectations that logs alone cannot satisfy. Veridra signs the decisions that matter, packages the supporting evidence, and gives model-risk teams something they can hand to an examiner.
SR 11-7 · ECB TRIM · CFPB · State DFS AI supervision
Examiner packet
What a sector-ready receipt looks like
Ready for review
Decision ID
dec_bank_92K4A
System
credit-underwrite-v3
Jurisdiction
US bank + EU applicant
Policy check
14 / 14 checks passed
Signature
Ed25519 verified
Evidence pack
Exportable for examiner review
Record integrityunchanged
The sector changes. The signed substrate does not. Veridra produces the same receipt discipline across banking, insurance, healthcare, government, and regulated SaaS.
SR 11-7HIPAAEU AI Act Art. 12
Audit handoff

What risk and audit teams actually need.

veridra verify sector-decision.json --signature sig.ed25519 --inclusion-proof log-proof.json
Decision receipt verified
Human review captured
Policy enforcement recorded
Bundle ready for third-party inspection
What this proves

A signed receipt plus evidence pack turns weeks of reconstruction into direct inspection. That is the value common across every sector page on this site.

Expansion markets

Each sector has its own framework crosswalks and evidence requirements. The signed substrate stays the same, but the examiner, the clock, and the governing obligations do not.

Insurance

NAIC Model Bulletin on AI, state DOI circulars (Colorado Reg 10-1-1, NY DFS Circular Letter 7), and GDPR Article 22 compliance for claims and underwriting decisions. Signed accountability records per claim.

Healthcare

HIPAA-aligned PHI handling, FDA SaMD and PCCP guidance, 21 CFR Part 11 electronic records, ONC HTI-1 decision support transparency. Clinical AI with PHI-aware policy enforcement.

Government & public sector

FedRAMP-aligned controls, FISMA, IL4/IL5 deployment paths, OMB M-24-10 and state-level AI disclosure laws. Sovereign deployment options with encryption and air-gap variants.

Regulated SaaS

Trust-center parity across your customer base. Per-tenant signed decisions and downstream-tenant evidence workflows for teams that need to extend assurance to customer-facing AI products.

By use case

The frameworks differ by sector, but the underlying evidence patterns repeat. These are the use-case pages compliance, legal, and model-risk teams most often search for when they are trying to understand what signed decision evidence actually looks like in practice.

  • AI Governance — multi-framework registry alignment, system inventory, risk tiering, policy-as-code.
  • Model Risk Management — SR 11-7 pillars with AI-specific extensions, challenger models, examiner-ready validation.
  • AI Compliance — obligation mapping with evidence citations across EU AI Act, NIST, SR 11-7, ISO, HIPAA, GDPR.
  • Agent Accountability — SPIFFE SVIDs, tool-call audit trails, human-approval gates.
  • AI Incident Response — cryptographic time-of-knowledge, signed postmortems, reproducible incident packs.
Scope boundary
What Veridra handles directly. What stays with your stack.
The use cases above describe where signed decision evidence matters most. They do not mean Veridra replaces your governance tooling, observability stack, or audit workflow systems.
Three modules, every sector
Govern → Attest → Watch
Govern registers every system into the framework crosswalks your jurisdiction requires. Attest signs every decision that matters to the framework. Watch catches divergence before the examiner does. The modules don't change by industry — the policies you write inside them do.
Why sectoral fit matters
Frameworks aren't generic
A healthcare deployment under HIPAA and FDA SaMD has different evidence requirements than a bank deployment under SR 11-7. A regulated SaaS provider extending evidence to downstream tenants has different workflow needs than a public-sector deployment under FISMA. The platform is sector-agnostic at the substrate level, but the sector pages exist because the obligations, the clock, and the examiner are not the same.